Skip to content Skip to footer

Electrifying the track 

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Faced with growing pressure to reduce carbon emissions, European countries are increasingly making moves to power trains with electricity instead of diesel. In the UK, however, progress has often appeared hampered. Simone Bruckner, managing director at Cressall Resistors, looks at why the electrification of rail transport should be prioritised. 

According to the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE), the UK’s share of electrified railways comes in at 42%. In contrast to the over 60% of other comparable European countries, this figure seems rather meagre. In 2018, the government announced proposals to phase out all diesel trains by 2040. For this ambition to come to fruition, we must act on the benefits of electrification. 

Why electrify?

Many people working in the rail industry feel that recent electrification cutbacks are a mistake. One reason for the reduction is the potential of bi-mode trains, which use both electric and diesel to run on electrified sections of the network before switching over to non-electrified sections when the former aren’t available. 

While this technology means that passengers can benefit from electric rail much sooner, as less disruptive electrification works such as overhead wiring and masts are required, bi-mode trains cannot be seen as a silver bullet solution. Uncertainty continues to arise over their performance compared to totally electric locomotives, as well as the implications of continuing to use diesel power. 

Diesel engines have obvious disadvantages. Fuel is significantly more expensive than electric traction, with a report from the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) revealing that Virgin West Coast trains spends 40% of its traction cost on diesel fuel, despite the fuel powering just 15% of its fleet. Diesel engines are also expensive to buy and maintain, and their heavier weight requires additional track maintenance.

With electric trains being increasingly powered by renewables, their fuel source is not affected by fluctuating oil prices and shortages. In addition, the power output of a diesel engine is limited by its rating, and its traction power is further reduced as the engine also has to supply the train’s hotel load. Electric traction power, however, is limited by its thermal loading and as a result it can operate for short periods at peak power. Partly for this reason, an electric multiple unit has typically twice the acceleration of a diesel multiple unit.

In diesel mode, bi-mode trains suffer from the same cost and carbon drawbacks as diesel-only trains. When in this mode, they only have the traction power of around 60% of their electric mode, lacking the speed and acceleration needed to improve services. 

Breaking point

When braking, a train’s kinetic energy cannot be stored on-board. On a diesel train, this energy is dissipated as heat using brake discs or from a roof-mounted rheostat that regulates the current flowing through it by changing the resistance. On electric trains, this braking energy can be fed back into the grid, offering energy savings of up to 20%. 

During rheostatic braking, electric energy is dissipated by a bank of onboard resistors, often referred to as the braking grid. In regenerative braking, the electricity is immediately reused by other locomotives or stored for later use. This electricity can be transmitted through overhead wires or an electrified third rail. Alternatively, it can be stored onboard using a flywheel, battery or other energy storage system. 

As such, regenerative braking benefits both the environment, by reducing the demand of energy from the public grid, and the economy for the rail operator, by prolonging maintenance intervals thanks to the reduced wear of the mechanical brakes.

Putting into place

While this method of braking helps make rail transport one of the most energy-efficient forms of mass transportation, it comes with limitations. The ability to return electricity is only available for trains that are electrically powered and in constant contact with their power sources, such as subways and other underground rail systems.

In cases where there are no other trains on the track, or the distances between trains is too great, the regenerated energy is dissipated in brake resistors, mounted either on the trains themselves or else at fixed locations alongside the track.

While there is some reluctance in switching to electric power, it is difficult to ignore the benefits of ditching diesel. For routes with dense traffic and lines that need electric traction to obtain high speeds, electrifying the rail is the most effective and sustainable means of network upgrade. 

However, while we must welcome progress towards electrifying the rail, we must also make sure that the technology is in place to boost efficiency on the tracks even when electrifying is not possible. As part of a fully electrified rail system, dynamic braking resistors are critical in ensuring excess traction can be dissipated safely.


Show CommentsClose Comments

Leave a comment